|
|
Alarm Systems using Internet and mobile phones |
![]() |
|---|
|
This page deals with Internet-connected detecting devices of different kinds. One interesting example of this technology is the proliferation of webcameras, whose pictures are generally available on the Internet. Cities, such as for instance
Seattle in the USA, can show maps where web camera positions are indicated. The visitor can click on one of these positions, and get a direct view of what the camera sees. As shown in view A in the illustration at right, Internet-connected devices can be directly addressable from the Internet (the IP-addresses used in the illustration are just examples). But this is rarely done, both for administrative reasons and to save IP-addresses. The most common solutions are instead to configure the detecting devices into LANs (as in view B) or into WLANs (wireless LANs, as in view C). Contact with these devices are not limited to the Internet, however. The use of various wireless technologies is mushrooming, and two-way contact with these devices, using for instance cellular phones, is quite possible. The usual way to do this is by way of a central control and communications unit, as shown below, which can handle several detecting devices of different kinds, configured in a local network.
![]() As shown, the central unit controls, on the one hand, all the detecting devices, and on the other can communicate with a local computer, with Internet, over a phone modem or by acting as a cellular phone. | ![]() |
|---|
As premiums for property insurance keep increasing, the interest in burglar alarms and detection devices for prevention of damage is also increasing. It is rather peculiar to note that these kinds of devices are not as obvious features of homes and business premisses as are telephones and electricity. The apparent reason is that people often regard them as unnecessary expenses, and donīt do enough as real protection against theft and damage. But times are changing. As insurance premiums go up, these kinds of devices are becoming cheaper. And we can actually do something about their efficiency, if we make proper use of todayīs communications possibilities. Consider these facts:
The biggest need is, thus, to quickly convey accurate and complete information about whatīs happening on vacated premises, to those who can as soon as possible do something about it, and not to bother persons who canīt. And to do this at an affordable price, so that all areas and objects that might need some kind of protection also gets it. The smartest way to accomplish this is by way of:
|
One can divide detector types in several ways. One way is to differ between those detectors that report continuosly, such as web cameras and "hearthbeat detectors", and those detectors that are set to monitor certain activities, and only send reports when such an activity occur. Another way is to differ between active detectors (which require a constant power supply) and passive (which do not). Communication interfaces:
Types of detectors The detectors themselves are the usual kinds, that have been around for a while, such as:
|
We at Johnson Consulting intend to present technical details of installation and function of this equipment in this space, as time permits. |
|
Last Updated: 2007-01-02
| Author: Ove Johnsson |
|---|